Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Kratom ordinance enforcement results→At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 20, 2026.
Public comments (7)
A 70-year-old user of ten years, said natural kratom leaf ended his anxiety when pharmaceuticals failed, and urged the council to distinguish leaf from synthetic 7-OH.
City Council — January 20, 2026 · 1:22:03 →A retired drug and alcohol counselor whose son overcame heroin addiction with kratom, asked the council to keep the leaf legal while banning synthetics.
City Council — January 20, 2026 · 1:22:01 →After 22 hip surgeries and a lifetime on opioids, said kratom restored her quality of life; she supported banning 7-OH but urged keeping natural leaf available.
City Council — January 20, 2026 · 1:23:58 →A chronic pain patient who lost prescribed opioids in 2018, said kratom manages his pain; argued pending bills AB 1088 and SB 578 would regulate appropriately and cited the Riverside County ordinance model.
City Council — January 20, 2026 · 1:25:39 →A former heroin addict and author of a book on kratom, cited Johns Hopkins research and FDA statements, urging the city to ban 7-OH but regulate natural kratom like other cities have.
City Council — January 20, 2026 · 1:29:23 →A retired RN, said kratom is not intoxicating and helps her manage pain from herniated discs; urged the council to keep natural kratom available.
City Council — January 20, 2026 · 1:33:01 →A 67-year-old contractor, said kratom helped him and his mother-in-law avoid prescription opioid dependence after seeing doctors push painkillers.
City Council — January 20, 2026 · 1:34:56 →